Evaluating Web-Based Resources for the Classroom and Annotated List of Websites

Evaluation Rubric
Criteria
Poor
Good
Excellent
Appearance
Advertisements and popups are plentiful.  Poor quality graphics.  Few/no visuals or visuals are of poor quality and irrelevant.
Many visuals.  Some visuals are irrelevant or of poor quality.  Text is too small or requires one to scroll laterally.  Several advertisements.
Visually pleasing and stimulating.  Visuals are attractive and relevant.  Visuals are clearly labeled.  Text is easily legible.  Information is clearly organized.
Content
Content is commercial or political in nature.  Highly biased.  Content is inaccurate.  Poor grammar and spelling throughout.  Information is out of date.  No authorship is cited.  Content inappropriate for intended audience.
Content is pertinent, but may be slightly dated.  Few spelling/grammar errors.  Author may/may not be identified.  all information may not be at level for intended audience.
Content is pertinent and free of bias.  Information is accurate.  Grammar and spelling are correct.  Information is up to date.  Author of site is identified.  Information is appropriate for intended audience.
Navigability
Poorly organized information.  No internal or external links provided.
Information is logically organized.  Some links provided may be irrelevant or not working.
Home page provided.  Information is easy to find and grouped in logical order.  Internal and external links are provided and working properly.  Contains a keyword search.
Availability of Further Information
None provided.
Some links provided.  Some links may not be relevant or working properly.
Many links to other useful sites provided.

Up until now, I have never formally evaluated websites as to their worthiness in the classroom.  For years, I have known within myself what constitutes a good website from a poor one, but I had never quantified such.  In an attempt to develop criteria for students to use for judgement of websites, I first thought about what sites I suggest to my students to check out and why.  Later, I will discuss three specific sites I suggest and use most often with them in my Astronomy course.  The criteria or evaluation is in the form of a rubric that outlines what I believe one should look for in excellent, good, or poor web sites.  In most cases, these web sites are evaluated based upon their appearance, content, ease of navigation or usabilty, and the availability of links to other useful and pertinent sites of interest.

Let's first discuss appearance.  The initial appearance a web site has on a student can have a lasting impression.  Does the site draw your attention to it?  If it does, chances are you will begin to scan the site for relevance.  Visuals can aid in stimulating the reader as well as help the reader to understand the site's purpose and audience.  Text should be easy to read and organized and easy on the eyes (no harsh color combinations).  Images should be included to aid in understanding (a picture is worth a thousand words).  maybe most importantly, there should be few advertisements - particularly of the "pop up" variety.  These detract from the purpose of the site which should be educational or informative in nature.

Once a web site has drwan your attention to it, the content of the site is vitally important.  Any site students use in the classroom should be relevant and not biased or motivated in any way.  The content needs to be accurate and up to date.  Accurate information can be verified either bu one's own knowledge of a topic or through additional research.  Often websites are not up to date with current information.  for example, a web site that states that Saturn has eighteen moons would be way out of date.  That was true four years ago, but the current count is sixty.  Reliable and up to date websites will often state at the bottom of the homepage when the page was last modified.  Sites whose content can be considered reliable will identify the author(s) and even their credentials.  Lastly, a good site will have very few or no spelling and grammar errors.  Care was taken to ensure that that content presented has been proofread.  Unreliable sites will often have many grammatical and spelling errors.  How reliable can a web site be if care was not taken to be sure something as simple as grammar and spelling are not correct?

One very important aspect of all good and effective websites are how easily they are navigated.  All good websites are designed with the ease of use in mind.  Good web sites are clearly organized in a logical order and topics can be linked from a home page.  Links or options that can be accessed are available from the homepage.  This allows students to be able to search additional information while having the ability to go back to where they were easily.  Also, sites that contain keyword search functions aid in ease and speed of information retrieval.  All these aspects allow students to easily find information without causing frustration or discouragement in obtaining information.

Finally, the ability of outside links to other resources is a hallmark of good and effective websites.  Many of the most reliable and accurate websites will list their sources of information for students to research.  In this way, students can cater their learning towards even more specific information relevant to them.  The accuracy of what's printed on the website can be easily verified from other sources.  the best websites will often rely on information that comes directly from professional sources (such as NASA).

The appearance, content, navigability, and availability of further information are all very basic criteria anyone could use to evaluate a website.  With experience, this evaluation can be done quickly, effectively, and without formality.  Empowering students with the ability to effectively evaluate reliable, accurate, and useful websites gives thema tool they will always use and rely on..


Annotated Websites

The following three websites are sites that I have often suggested my Astronomy students check out for research or interest.  Up until now, I have never formally evaluated how good these sites really are.  Using the above rubric, I will evaluate these three sites I suggest to my students: "The Nine Planets", Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD)", and "Sky and Telescope".

The Nine Planets
http://www.nineplanets.org/

"The Nine Planets" is a multimedia tour of the solar system.  As the homepage for this site appears, the first thing a students will notice is that the "Nine" is scratched out and replaced with a hand-written "8".  This is nice and suggests to the reader that this site contains something new.  The homepage immediately features a link to the author's page as well as an introduction to what the site is.  A very extensive table of contents follows with internal links to each topic.  There are some advertisements, but these ads are astronomy related and would be of interest to anyone interested in a site such as this.  The bottom of the page features a copyright notice and when the page was last updated.  While the homepage is not the most visually stunning, the opening graphic and the very well organized and linkable table of contents does suggest that this is a very extensive and useful site that requires further investigation of it.

Navigation to any topic is effortless.  Links are not only appropriate, but offer evn more than a student might expect.  A Google "keyword" search feature is also offered.

The content within the site is very accurate, thorough, well organized, and maybe most importantly, current.  Students will have no problem finding relevant information from within the site.  Information is science basedand bias free.  Key terms or vocabulary a student would need to know are linkable and offer extended detail.  Pronunciation can be listened to for many of the more difficult satellite names.  Images are appropriate and relevant if not overly abundant within the text.

Each linkable topic offers external links to primary sources of images and information.

This site has been, and is an excellent site, and I will continue to suggest it to my students as a primary site of interest when researching solar system information.


Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD)
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/

"Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD)" is a site dedicated to celebrating the wonders of the universe through pictures; "Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer".  One is immediately struck by a single, large image.  The image can be clicked to allow the highest resolution available.  Image is properly titled and credits are linked.  Images are often very up to date (within a day or two of initial publication).  While the site is not a large page, it serves its intended purpose.  No advertisements appear.

The content is short, sweet, and to the point.  A brief explanation is offered for what the image details.  The site is very well organized with no spelling or grammar errors.  Information is science based and without bias.  Key terms and vocabulary are highlighted and linkable within the text.  A nice featured offered for students is a glossary.  Iin addition, the image can be further discussed in detail with others via a discuss link.

Navigation within the site is simple and logical.  An archive is offered and links to previous images are easily accessed and organized based on type or when they were posted via a calendar.  A keyword search is also offered.

Many internal and external links are offered to primary sources of images and information and all work accordingly.

This is another excellent site for topics of discussion to start class with everyday.  It is current and at the same time far-reaching in its scope, and does a great job of drawing interest to the world of astronomy without gimmicks or underlying agendas.


Sky and Telescope
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/

This site is an online version of a very popular magazine by the same title and is popular among the amateur astronomy community as well as professionals alike.  The homepage is visually attractive, colorful, and offers a wealth of linkable information available within the site (just as the magazine) and is up to date.  It is well organized, but a bit too "busy" in terms of strictly trying to find information.  There are many advertisements throughout the site and a popup ad on the homepage for ordering the magazine; understandable, but a bit annoying.  The publishers and authors of the articles have links ("Meet the Staff").  each article within the site offers relevant and appropriate images of interest.

The site offers articles on a wide variety of topics of interest to students and amateur astronomers.  Of use in the classroom are linkable and printable star charts, as well as the latest news in the world of astronomy.  The "News" information is accurate and links are embedded to primary sources of information.  The text is well written and appropriate for high school students.  Newsrticles are written in sciebce based and unbiased terms.  "How To" articles are practical, if not completely without bias.  Product reviews require a monthly fee.

The site is easily navigable and all links work to outside sources of information.

I would rate this site as a good site.  While this site is an extension of the magazine, and as such, advertising abounds, it is considered a trade magazine; the sort that both amateurs and professionals alike read.  This site is a good resource to the latest news and equipment that a high school astronomy student may be interested in, as well as very well written articles on a wide variety of topics that we discuss in class.  These articles are often written by the professionals who research such topics.  As a teacher, it is difficult to steer students away from the advertisements offered, but the ads in total are for products an amateur astronomer would be interested in or help to develop their interest in astronomy.  Overall, I still feel this is the type of resource a student would be interested in to help develop their interest in astronomy.